This summer i’m in the business simulation class offered by CU Boulder. The class utilizes the Marketplace Simulation at marketplace-simulation.com. So far we’ve gone through 4 quarters worth of decisions and I have been very impressed with the simulation.
Basically students work in teams to run a computer manufacturing company. We have to manage all aspects of the company and it has been challenging so far! The teams are pitted against themselves battling for market share and portions of the grade are determined by where you stand in the market. Just some things that we have to manage and consider:
Manufacturing
- Location
- Capacity
- Quarterly production rates
- Change-over costs
- R&D to improve quality
- Inventory holding costs
Product
- Brand Design (based on market research and feedback)
- Brand portfolio management
- Profitability
- Cannibalization
Sales and Marketing
- Ad creation, placement, and quantity
- Salesforce size and location
- Salesforce distribution among brands
- Sale projections
General
- Financial statements
- Demand projections
- Strategy creation and implementation
- Being competitive
- Expansion
- Balancing risk
- Operating at a profit and generating positive retained earnings
So its been a really cool class so far but a TON of work. Quarter 3 was the first quarter that we could actually sell products. My team estimated our demand levels and adjusted our operating capacity to be a bit higher than what we expected from the demand. Upon coming back in quarter 4 we learned that we had overproduced tremendously and barely sold anything! As a result, we were hit with an excessive operating capacity cost that put us into a negative cash situation for the quarter! Ack, emergency loan was taken out from Guido but in doing so we had to give him some shares in the company. This really hurt our financial performance and hindered the amount of growth we could do in Quarter 4 because of our cash position.
My partner and I spent a ton of time working things out to get out of the hole we put ourselves in. At the core of the problem was not that our manufacturing was not setup very well, but that our brands just sucked really bad and nobody wanted to buy them. This problem was worse than we thought because we had almost capped our target inventory limits which meant that we had about 600 computers that nobody wanted! We had only managed to acquire less than 8% of the market in quarter 3, with 5 other competitors.
After looking at the market data we decided the best course of action was to make our brands better. We felt this was at the core to our quarter 3 failure. One of our brands actually fit well with a market we hadn’t considered so we decided to create an ad for this market and sell our excess 300 computers there rather than getting raped by scrap prices. Another of our brands performed so horribly across all 5 markets (sad) that we decided to scrap all of it for next quarter. The third brand performed poorly, but we decided to sell it at a huge discount into one of the markets, without any advertising, to make a bit more money than if we were to scrap them. The inventory holding cost was only 30,000 a quarter and if we sold just 15 computers we’d be able to cover that.
Then we worked on two new and improved brands for release in quarter 4. We chose new names so as not to drag the old brand image into the new. We also created two new ads to go along with the brands, priced them below the market leader by a smidge and advertised a large amount in periodicals rather than only local markets. At the end of the day it all came down to production and demand projections. How many computers did we expect to sell?
Well in quarter 3 we expected to sell 700 and ended up selling only 161, ouch. We did not want to make the same mistake. Our projections put us at 1700-2000 units though. We decided to play it somewhat safe and set production at 1100 units, and pull 400 units from inventory to get close to the demand projection of 1700 units.
After quarter 4 results we realized we had estimated low! Dangit! Because our production rates were set too low we ended up losing out on 500 units worth of sales. Total demand was 1819 but we were only able to meet the demand with 1240 computers. This is going to result in a lot of ill will in next quarter but the lucky part is that most of the lost sales were in the low margin cost cutter segment…an area where we were just playing in to get rid of some poorly design computers. Hopefully this ill will will not hurt the other markets for us.
So in one quarter we:
- Improved total market share from 7.8% to 19.6%
- Improved demand from 161 units to 1819.
- Generated a positive net income (first time)
- Put ourselves in a much stronger position for quarter 5 with regards to raising additional capital to fund futher expansion in sales and manufacturing output.
Pretty pumped.
So overall the first year in the market simulation has been full of ups and downs for us. Quarter 5 is all about bringing some investors in and blowing the roof off the computer market. We’ll head into our initial strategy more, and expand to new markets in search for market share!



